The Environmental Forum

Volume 42 Issue 4

September-October 2025

This issue's articles are available below.

ELI Members may login to read and download current and past issues of the Forum.
Not a member? Join now!


Intelligence Report

BRIEFING As AI expands its role in daily life, climate advocates have sounded the alarm on the technology’s growing impacts on energy, water, and public health. Yet the public remains largely in the dark when it comes to understanding the full consequences of this boom.

By Akielly Hu
Environmental Journalist

With SIDEBARs by human futurist David Rejeski and by AI bot ChatGPT.

From Deference to Deliberation

CROSS-EXAMINATION With less room to interpret ambiguous laws after the demise of the Chevron precedent, agencies must now work within narrow legal boundaries. Further, statutory meaning may come to be shaped by judicial reasoning rather than regulatory interpretation.

By Loza Taye, Rebecca Critser and Akosua Dufie
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health

With SIDEBARs from John Cruden and Sanne H. Knudsen.

The Shadow Rule

COVER STORY The little-known, judge-made administrative-remand rule can control access to federal appellate courts. It makes the courts more efficient and gives agencies space to correct their errors, but it also hamstrings litigants and can undermine environmental protection.

By Matthew J. Sanders
Stanford Law School

With SIDEBARs from Norman A. Dupont and Andrew Mergen.

Chocolate With No Bitter Aftertaste

FIELD REPORT A few companies exercise control over the global cacao supply—profiting handsomely from tropical deforestation and human rights abuses. But there is another way. A paradigm changer’s experience working directly with producers committed to sustainable production of heirloom cacao.

By Lori Shapiro
Sueños Heirloom Chocolate
The Debate: The New Toxic Substances Control Act Is Now Five Years Old: A Report

THE DEBATE Supporters envision an energy economy built on zero-carbon fuels that cut air pollution and create new jobs while building on existing electric and gas infrastructure. But critics describe the green hydrogen economy as a pipedream and an expensive energy boondoggle. Currently comprising less than 1 percent of global hydrogen production, clean hydrogen investments will reach a 31 percent annual compound growth rate by 2032, predicts fuel cell company Plug Power, Inc. But what are the green hydrogen economy’s real projected impacts?

By Selene Law, Jonathan Lesser, Nile Malloy and Joseph Romm
Energy & Power, National Center for Energy Analytics, California Environmental Justice Alliance, Penn Center for Science, Sustainability, and the Media
By: David P. Clarke

Alarms About Trump Assaults on Federal Science and Data Banks.

By: Craig M. Pease

The Synergy and Conflicts of Public Versus Private Science.

By: Linda K. Breggin

Actions by State AGs Abound, but Efforts Seek to Limit Authority.

By: Ethan Shenkman

Five Decades of Cleaner Air: The Clean Air Act’s Incredible Benefits.

By: Bethany A. Davis Noll

A Bonanza of Decisions That Will Change Environmental Practice.

By: Bob Sussman

The Price of the Beautiful Bill’s Epic Wrong Turn on Climate Change.

By: Joseph E. Aldy

Economic Significance of Power Sector Carbon Dioxide Emissions.

By: Stephen R. Dujack

Intractable Policies Are Making Great Salt Lake Disappear

By: Lynn Scarlett

Lynn Scarlett on the Many Values of Public Lands

By: ELI Staff

See Colleagues' Job Changes and Honors Received.

Webinar Series Tracks Turmoil at Federal Agencies

By: Jordan Diamond

Shifting Waters of Cooperative Federalism