This issue's articles are available below.
ELI Members may login to read and download current and past issues of the Forum.
Not a member? Join now!
OPENING ARGUMENT The administration’s deregulatory actions ignore our society’s shared vision, for half a century, that there should be constant environmental improvement. The Trump EPA instead is turning on its head the legal, political, and practical history of the Clean Air Act.
With a SIDEBAR by Ann Carlson of UCLA Law School
CROSS-EXAMINATION It’s time to seize the moment to codify the rights of nature into U.S. law. The difficulties in the political dynamics of our times actually offer a unique opportunity to engage leaders and citizens alike in discussions about this relatively unfamiliar legal strategy.
With SIDEBARs from two activists in the rights of nature movement
COVER STORY The success of the president’s trade strategy remains to be seen, but his promotion of “national security” as a driver can also be used by advocates to advance environmental protection. In the offing is a global security consensus that could be green and genuinely collective.
With a SIDEBAR from Beveridge & Diamond’s Paul Hagen.
PROFILE As utility giant Exelon’s chief legal officer and corporate secretary, Colette Honorable is capping a career that helps her see all sides of complex energy issues and work with diverse regulators and stakeholders.
THE DEBATE Corporate climate risk disclosure rules across the world are shifting. In the United States, this past March the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it will no longer defend its 2024 Climate Disclosure Rule in ongoing litigation. The rule is currently still in effect, but is not being implemented. Then in September, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed ending requirements for large businesses to report their greenhouse gas emissions.
The climate risk disclosure landscape is also softening internationally, with a recent proposal from the European Union to narrow its Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. And Canada recently announced that it will pause the development of its climate-related disclosure rule.
But that is not the whole story. At the state level, California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and Climate-Related Financial Risk Act impose disclosure requirements beginning in 2026 for large companies that do business in the state. Similar bills have been introduced in Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Washington.
ELI convened an expert panel for a members-only webinar providing professionals with the latest information on the state of climate risk disclosure laws. The discussion covered what will be mandated domestically and abroad starting next year, and how these requirements might continue to change in the coming months. What follows is a transcript of that event that has been edited for length and clarity.
How Repeal of the Endangerment Finding Could Backfire on Polluters
NIH and CDC Face Cuts of Staff and Funding for Critical Research
State Policies Could Help Realize Potential Data Center Heat Reuse
AI, Data Centers, and Permitting Reform: Has the Moment Arrived?
Solar and ESG Cases Test the New Loper Bright Standard
Global Ecology, Humanity’s Fate: An Alarm More Urgent Than Ever
Managing Impact of AI on Power Demand, Prices, and Emissions
A Time When Political Turbulence Led to the First Environmental Laws
On the Treasure of Natural Grasslands
See Colleagues' Job Changes and Honors Received.
Webinar on Repeal of EPA Endangerment Finding
Still Making the Case for Environmental Protection