Home | Events | Site Map | Contact Us
Click for more information about joining ELI. Click to donate to ELI. Click to subscribe to ELI. Click for information about ELI events.
# Click to log in to member and subscribers information.
#
Click to read About ELI.
Click for information on Program Areas.
Click for Publications.
Click for membership information.
Click for Development information.
Click for News & Press Releases.
ELI Vision Statement: A healthy environment, prosperous economies, and vibrant communities founded on the rule of law.
Follow ELI on Twitter. Follow ELI on Linkedin. Follow ELI on Facebook.
Bookmark and Share
 

April 13, 2011

American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut:
The Next Landmark Supreme Court Climate Case

In what many are calling the most important environmental case since Massachusetts v. EPA, on April 19, 2011, the Supreme Court will hear arguments to decide whether states and private parties can sue power companies under federal common law for contributing to global warming and compel them to cap CO2 emissions. The case was originally brought in 2004 by various states, New York City and several land trusts against certain utilities, arguing that the utilities were creating a public nuisance because they were emitting greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

Though three other similar cases have been brought around the country, none has yet made it to trial--and AEP is the first to reach the Supreme Court. Significant developments include: the recusal of Justice Sonya Sotomayor; an Obama administration brief filed on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority that sides with industry; and a brief by G.O.P. lawmakers saying that the case involves political and public policy matters that should be left to the legislative and executive branches of the government to address. Environmentalists point out that, to date, there is little to indicate that the other branches of government are taking meaningful action to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

This high-level panel discussed and debated the major issues at play and the likely outcome of the case, including the critical questions of constitutional standing and application of the "political question doctrine," as well as whether a federal common law cause of action to cap climate emissions exists -- and, if so, whether EPA’s actions to date on climate change have effectively displaced it.

PANELISTS:
Richard Bress, Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP
Eric Glitzenstein, Partner, Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal
James May, Professor of Law, Widener University
David B. Rivkin, Jr., Partner, Baker & Hostetler LLP

MODERATOR: Bruce Myers, Senior Attorney, Environmental Law Institute

Amicus Briefs from Panelists:

Additional Materials:
mp3 recording

For information on the case: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/american-electric-power-co-inc-v-connecticut-2/

This ELI Policy Seminar was made possible by the generous support of our members
and the Institute’s Endangered Environmental Laws Program, a major initiative focusing on the
intersection of U.S. constitutional and environmental law.

May 21, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Short-Term Assurances

May 30, 2013
NRDA: Pros, Cons & Mechanics of Cooperation

May 30, 2013
Book Release: Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Law

June 3, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Long-Term Financing

June 10, 2013
Summit: Private Environmental Governance

June 11, 2013
Monthly Climate Change Briefing

June 11, 2013
Summer School: Careers in Envtl Law & Policy

June 11-16, 2013
ELI Summer School Series

June 13, 2013
Summer School: NEPA, ESA & Fundamentals

MORE EVENTS
#

On the Importance of Judges
by ELI President John Cruden

 

Plastic Bag Laws Proliferate
by ELI Senior Attorney Linda Breggin

 

Lesson From Liberia, Where a New Law Is Not Enough
by ELI Senior Attorney Sandra Nichols

©2013 Environmental Law Institute. All rights reserved. Copyright & Disclaimer