Home | Events | Site Map | Contact Us
Click for more information about joining ELI. Click to donate to ELI. Click to subscribe to ELI. Click for information about ELI events.
# Click to log in to member and subscribers information.
#
Click to read About ELI.
Click for information on Program Areas.
Click for Publications.
Click for membership information.
Click for Development information.
Click for News & Press Releases.
ELI Vision Statement: A healthy environment, prosperous economies, and vibrant communities founded on the rule of law.
Follow ELI on Twitter. Follow ELI on Linkedin. Follow ELI on Facebook.
Bookmark and Share
 

June 4, 2008

Massachusetts v. EPA — 1 Year Later

Cosponsored by the DC Bar Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Section and International Law Section’s Investment & Finance Committee

A year has passed since the Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, holding that EPA has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) under the Clean Air Act. The decision coincided with unprecedented urgency from the public and members of Congress to address climate change as a serious matter.

As a result of the Court’s ruling and the increased attention on global-warming issues, the EPA, states, and Congress have responded in a number of ways - from (1) California seeking and EPA denying a waiver to allow the state to regulate GHG based in part because of Congress’s passage of the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act to (2) the Agency’s recent announcement in letters to Congress of its intention to issue an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on the regulation of carbon dioxide from motor vehicles to (3) the recent mandamus filing by states and other parties in the D.C. Circuit seeking an endangerment finding for vehicle emissions of carbon dioxide. And while EPA ponders its options, states across the country continue to develop detailed plans for reducing GHG emissions.

Given these and other actions, it remains to be seen whether the Clean Air Act will be the primary mechanism for regulating GHG or whether Congress will act first to create a new and more comprehensive program, spurred on in part by litigation and regulatory initiatives advanced by the states. These issues are particularly important for practitioners, as any direction taken will have enormous and far-reaching legal consequences for their clients.

Our distinguished panelists examined and discussed these and other concerns, the legacy of Massachusetts v. EPA one year later, and what is at stake for business and the environment.

Speakers:
Robert Sussman
, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress (Moderator)
Jonathan Martel, Partner, Arnold & Porter LLP
Lisa Heinzerling, Professor, Georgetown University Law Center
David Bookbinder, Senior Attorney, Sierra Club
Roger Martella, former General Counsel, EPA

May 30, 2013
NRDA: Pros, Cons & Mechanics of Cooperation

May 30, 2013
Book Release: Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Law

June 3, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Long-Term Financing

June 10, 2013
Summit: Private Environmental Governance

June 11, 2013
Monthly Climate Change Briefing

June 11, 2013
Summer School: Careers in Envtl Law & Policy

June 11-16, 2013
ELI Summer School Series

June 13, 2013
Summer School: NEPA, ESA & Fundamentals

June 18, 2013
Summer School: Clean Air & Climate Change

June 19, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Compensation Planning

June 20, 2013
Summer School: Clean Water

MORE EVENTS
#

On the Importance of Judges
by ELI President John Cruden

 

Plastic Bag Laws Proliferate
by ELI Senior Attorney Linda Breggin

 

Lesson From Liberia, Where a New Law Is Not Enough
by ELI Senior Attorney Sandra Nichols

©2013 Environmental Law Institute. All rights reserved. Copyright & Disclaimer