Home | Events | Site Map | Contact Us
Click for more information about joining ELI. Click to donate to ELI. Click to subscribe to ELI. Click for information about ELI events.
# Click to log in to member and subscribers information.
#
Click to read About ELI.
Click for information on Program Areas.
Click for Publications.
Click for membership information.
Click for Development information.
Click for News & Press Releases.
ELI Vision Statement: A healthy environment, prosperous economies, and vibrant communities founded on the rule of law.
Follow ELI on Twitter. Follow ELI on Linkedin. Follow ELI on Facebook.
Bookmark and Share
 

July 31, 2012

What Does the Health Care Ruling Mean for Environmental Law?

Most environmental laws—such as the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and CERCLA—are based on the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which authorizes Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The recent constitutional challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and its "individual mandate" to purchase health insurance seemed certain to write a new chapter in Commerce Clause jurisprudence—with potential implications for environmental laws. The U.S. Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius heard arguments that Congress cannot compel individuals to enter commerce by purchasing health insurance and that doing so would exceed Congress’s constitutional authority.

In a blockbuster ruling, the Court surprised most observers by upholding the individual mandate under the Taxing Clause. But a majority of the court also held that ACA’s Medicaid expansion violates the Spending Clause by threatening non-complying states with a loss of existing funding. And five justices—the Chief Justice and four dissenters—concluded in separate opinions that the ACA runs afoul of the Commerce Clause. Given this outcome, what are its implications for environmental law? Will the Spending Clause ruling have consequences for the Clean Air Act or other environmental laws? Could the opinions on the Commerce Clause fuel new challenges to the scope of existing environmental laws, such as the ESA? Does this ruling suggest a rift among the Court’s conservative justices, and what might this mean for future cases?

Panelists:
Bruce Myers, Senior Staff Attorney, ELI (moderator)
Jonathan Adler, Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
James May, Professor of Law, Widener Law
David Weinberg, Partner, Wiley Rein LLP

Materials:
Slip Opinion, National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius
Jonathan Adler, "Could the Health Care Decision Hobble the Clean Air Act?"
Jonathan Adler, "Lose the battle, win the war?"
James May, "What Does the Health Care Ruling Mean for Environmental Law?: Commerce, Necessary and Proper, and Tax Clauses"
mp3 recording

May 30, 2013
NRDA: Pros, Cons & Mechanics of Cooperation

May 30, 2013
Book Release: Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Law

June 3, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Long-Term Financing

June 10, 2013
Summit: Private Environmental Governance

June 11, 2013
Monthly Climate Change Briefing

June 11, 2013
Summer School: Careers in Envtl Law & Policy

June 11-16, 2013
ELI Summer School Series

June 13, 2013
Summer School: NEPA, ESA & Fundamentals

June 18, 2013
Summer School: Clean Air & Climate Change

June 19, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Compensation Planning

June 20, 2013
Summer School: Clean Water

MORE EVENTS
#

On the Importance of Judges
by ELI President John Cruden

 

Plastic Bag Laws Proliferate
by ELI Senior Attorney Linda Breggin

 

Lesson From Liberia, Where a New Law Is Not Enough
by ELI Senior Attorney Sandra Nichols

©2013 Environmental Law Institute. All rights reserved. Copyright & Disclaimer