Home | Events | Site Map | Contact Us
Click for more information about joining ELI. Click to donate to ELI. Click to subscribe to ELI. Click for information about ELI events.
# Click to log in to member and subscribers information.
#
Click to read About ELI.
Click for information on Program Areas.
Click for Publications.
Click for membership information.
Click for Development information.
Click for News & Press Releases.
ELI Vision Statement: A healthy environment, prosperous economies, and vibrant communities founded on the rule of law.
Follow ELI on Twitter. Follow ELI on Linkedin. Follow ELI on Facebook.
Bookmark and Share
 

May 16, 2008

International Competition and Climate Change Legislation

A fundamental stumbling block to domestic climate legislation and international climate regimes has been concern about disparate levels of emission reduction in developing and developed countries and the consequent risks to the international competitiveness of U.S. industry and American jobs. The Kyoto Protocol was seen by both political parties as a bad deal for U.S. business and workers in large part because it failed to apply emissions limitations to developing nations that emit large amounts of greenhouse gases.

As pressure builds for federal action on climate legislation, international competitiveness concerns have come into sharp focus. The Senate will soon consider S. 2191, the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, which contains a provision authorizing the President to impose border adjustment fees on certain energy intensive products from countries that have not created climate programs "comparable" to the US regime. There is considerable debate about whether this approach will comply with WTO and, in addition, whether it will provide adequate protection to U.S. industries at risk. Competing proposals are circulating in Washington that would seek to "level the playing field" by different means. Pur illustrious panel of experts discussed:

  • Can and should federal climate legislation ensure American business a level playing field?
  • Are pending legislative proposals on international competitiveness effective and politically viable?
  • Are the legislative proposals legal? Would they survive World Trade Organization scrutiny?

Moderator:

Robert Sussman, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress

Panelists:

Jennifer Haverkamp, Senior Counsel, Environmental Defense Fund
Mark Linscott, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Environment and Natural Resources
Martin McBroom, Director, Federal Environmental Affairs, American Electric Power
Alan Price, Partner, Wiley Rein, LLP

Downloads:

Martin McBroom PowerPoint presentation, Handouts

Alan Price PowerPoint presentation, Handouts

Please click here for more information on the
Understanding Climate Change Law seminar series
.

June 11-16, 2013
ELI Summer School Series

June 19, 2013
The Smart Grid: Electric Vehicles on the Energy Highway

June 20, 2013
Summer School: Clean Water

June 25, 2013
Summer School: Clean Land--Haz Waste & Sites

June 26, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Accounts, Costs & Fees

June 27, 2013
Summer School: Law & Policy of Products Regulation

June 28, 2013
Offshore Aquaculture and the Magnuson-Stevens Act

July 2, 2013
In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Economic Feasibility

MORE EVENTS
#

Watch: John C. Cruden on Voluntary Corporate Standards

 

Plastic Bag Laws Proliferate
by ELI Senior Attorney Linda Breggin

 

From the Environmental Law Reporter
Adaptive Law and Resilience

©2013 Environmental Law Institute. All rights reserved. Copyright & Disclaimer